Inheritance & the family | findings

Attitudes to will-making and intestacy

Aug 2010 |

Our findings on will-making and testamentary freedom largely reflect finding from other studies. This study also produced new data about attitudes towards intestacy, which showed that current intestacy rules seem to be in tune with public attitudes. However, this is not the case when it comes to cohabitants, with respondents saying cohabitants should get greater recognition than they do under current intestacy rules.

The main part of the quantitative interview involved participants being presented with a series of hypothetical scenarios where someone had died without leaving a will. In each case, they were invited to indicate who (usually out of two competing interests) they thought should be receive the deceased's estate. Qualitative interviews explored these attitudes in more depth, findings a range of principles on which individuals based their views.

  1. Most people have not made a will.
  2. Those who have made a will favour leaving their estate to their children or spouses/civil partners.
  3. The study revealed complex attitudes towards testamentory freedom.
  4. In cases of intestacy there is strong support for surviving spouses receiving the majority of an estate, reflecting the current rules.
  5. After spouses, support in cases of intestacy was strongest for surviving children, again reflecting current rules.
Most people have not made a will.

Only 37% of respondents have made a will, although this proportion increases with age, with 82% of over 75s having made a will. Making a will is also related to marital status and financial worth. Participants in the qualitative study highlighted their family circumstance and financial wealth as catalysts or potential prompts to writing a will. They also took into consideration their risk of death, what they wanted to happen to their belongings after death and the need for clarity in order to avoid family arguments.

Back to top
Those who have made a will favour leaving their estate to their children or spouses/civil partners.

65% of respondents who had made a will had included their spouse or partner, while 73% had included their children. Giving priority to a spouse or partner was regarded by the qualitative participants at the 'natural thing to do' based on matters such as the couple's shared life and close relationship. Inclusion of children was attributed to the significance of lineage and blood ties as well as a desire to continue providing for children after death.

Back to top
The study revealed complex attitudes towards testamentory freedom.

Attitudes from the qualitative study fell into three broad groups: those who favoured complete testamentary freedom, those who preferred a combination of testamentary freedom with the ability to challenge a will under certain circumstances, and finally those who indicated that a will should always be challengeable. Circumstances in which a will could be challenged were largely based on principles such as blood-ties, marriage bonds, the relative need of potential beneficiaries and whether or not a person had contributed to the estate.

Back to top
In cases of intestacy there is strong support for surviving spouses receiving the majority of an estate, reflecting the current rules.

The majority (63%) favoured a surviving spouse receiving the entirity of a spouse's estate (rather than it going to a parent). However, support for spouses was weaker if the deceased had children. Qualitative study participants indicated that the importance attributed to spouses was based on the significance of marriage ties, as well as other factors such as joint contributions and emotional closeness.

Back to top
After spouses, support in cases of intestacy was strongest for surviving children, again reflecting current rules.

Although support was strongest for spouses, a substantial proportion of respondents favoured children receiving something from the estate. Qualitative study participants said that whether or not a child should be provided for indirectly (through provision made to the surviving spouse/partner) or directly, depended upon how far respondents trusted the surviving spouse/partner to act in the child's best interests. Where children were to inherit directly there was a strong view that the estate should be divided equally.

Back to top
 

You can:

Share this page

Of interest:

NatCen mailing list
Enter your email address to sign up to our NatCen mailing list